Pennsylvania Code & Bulletin
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

• No statutes or acts will be found at this website.

The Pennsylvania Bulletin website includes the following: Rulemakings by State agencies; Proposed Rulemakings by State agencies; State agency notices; the Governor’s Proclamations and Executive Orders; Actions by the General Assembly; and Statewide and local court rules.

PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 16-321

PROPOSED RULEMAKING

ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY BOARD

[ 25 PA CODE CHS. 210 AND 211 ]

Handling and Use of Explosives

[46 Pa.B. 996]
[Saturday, February 27, 2016]

 The Environmental Quality Board (Board) proposes to amend Chapters 210 and 211 (relating to blasters' licenses; and storage, handling and use of explosives) to read as set forth in Annex A.

 This proposed rulemaking was adopted by the Board at its meeting of September 15, 2015.

A. Effective Date

 This proposed rulemaking will be effective upon final-form publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.

B. Contact Persons

 For further information, contact Thomas Callaghan, PG, Director, Bureau of Mining Programs, Rachel Carson State Office Building, 5th Floor, 400 Market Street, P. O. Box 8461, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8461, (717) 787-5015; or Joseph Iole, Assistant Counsel, Bureau of Regulatory Counsel, P. O. Box 8464, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8464, (717) 787-7060. Information regarding submitting comments on this proposed rulemaking appears in Section J of this preamble. Persons with a disability may use the Pennsylvania AT&T Relay Service, (800) 654-5984 (TDD users) or (800) 654-5988 (voice users). This proposed rulemaking is available on the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) web site at www.dep.state.pa.us (select ''Public Participation,'' then ''Environmental Quality Board (EQB)'').

C. Statutory Authority

 This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority of sections 1917-A and 1920-A of The Administrative Code of 1929 (71 P. S. §§ 510-17 and 510-20), sections 7 and 11 of the act of July 1, 1937 (P. L. 2681, No. 537) (73 P. S. §§ 157 and 161), section 3 of the act of July 10, 1957 (P. L. 685, No. 362) (73 P. S. § 166), Reorganization Plan No. 8 of 1981 (71 P. S. § 751-35) (transferring powers and duties conferred under the 1937 and 1957 explosives acts from the Department of Labor and Industry to the Department of Environmental Resources), section 2(f) of the act of May 18, 1937 (P. L. 654, No. 174) (43 P. S. § 25-2(f)), Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1975 (71 P. S. § 751-22) (transferring powers and duties conferred under the 1937 workplace safety law regarding pits, quarries, and the like, from the Department of Labor and Industry to the Department of Environmental Resources), section 4.2 of the Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act (52 P. S. § 1396.4b) and section 11(e) of the Noncoal Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act (52 P. S. § 3311(e)).

D. Background and Purpose

 The proposed rulemaking amends explosive regulations to address blasting activities for seismic exploration. While permits are currently required for this activity, a supplement to the Department's blasting activity permit application form is necessary because detailed information is needed for site security and regulatory compliance. This seismic supplement form provides the applicant an opportunity to provide the detailed information. The specifications for this additional information are included in this proposed rulemaking. For example, it is often necessary for explosive charges to remain in the ground for extended periods of time—the regulations specify the security measures needed to protect the public safety. The proposed rulemaking will codify requirements, providing certainty to the regulated community regarding the regulatory framework for seismic exploration. The proposed rulemaking also updates explosives use requirements to reflect current practices, eliminates antiquated requirements and provides a more effective enforcement mechanism. The updated requirements will result in more consistency between the requirements for construction blasting and blasting for mining operations. Regarding enforcement, the existing regulations entail criminal penalties for blasting-related violations, imposed by means of summary citations and possible misdemeanor charges. The proposed rulemaking provides a system for issuing civil penalty assessments for these violations. The proposed rulemaking also includes a revised fee schedule to cover costs associated with various permit-related work, license renewals and required onsite safety inspections.

Advisory board collaboration and outreach

 Because the mining regulations require compliance with Chapters 210 and 211, the Department reviewed the proposed rulemaking with the Mining and Reclamation Advisory Board and the Aggregate Advisory Board. On April 23, 2015, the Mining and Reclamation Advisory Board voted to recommend that the proposed rulemaking proceed. On May 20, 2015, the Aggregate Advisory Board voted to recommend the same.

 There is not an advisory board for the use of explosives for construction or seismic exploration. The Department did outreach through the trade groups for these industry sectors and with the Pennsylvania chapters of the International Society of Explosives Engineers.

E. Summary of Proposed Regulatory Requirements

Chapter 210. Blasters' licenses

§ 210.11. Definitions

 The proposed rulemaking includes the addition of definitions of ''ATF,'' ''employee possessor,'' ''explosive materials,'' ''limited'' and ''responsible person.'' The term ''limited'' is proposed to be added as a category of a blaster's license. This is the category that blasters who use explosives for activities when blasting is not related to excavation or demolition and which applies to seismic exploration operations. Other explosives users who fit within the limited category include those who detonate or supervise the loading of explosives charges in well perforation operations or industrial processes. The other definitions are proposed to be added because the blaster's license requirements are coordinated with the requirements of the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). ATF regulations require background checks for explosives users so there is no need for the Department to duplicate this effort.

§ 210.13. General

 Subsection (b) is proposed to be added and existing subsections (b)—(d) are proposed to be renumbered as subsections (c)—(e). Proposed subsection (b) requires verification that a person applying for a blaster's license has complied with ATF requirements.

§ 210.15. License application

 Proposed amendments to subsection (a) increase the fee amount for a new blaster's license from $50 to $150 to cover the costs for administering the blaster's certification program.

§ 210.16. Examinations

 Proposed amendments to subsection (c) add the time frame of 2 weeks to the prior notice needed to avoid forfeiture of the application fee if an applicant fails to appear for a blaster's license examination. This is necessary as the Department needs to be able to plan for classes to provide sufficient resources.

§ 210.17. Issuance and renewal of licenses

 Proposed amendments to subsection (a) delete the seismic and pole line and well perforation categories of blaster's licenses and add a category for law enforcement. The deleted categories are properly classified under the limited category. The law enforcement category is proposed to be added to reflect the unique circumstances regarding the use of explosives for training by police bomb squads and for regulatory officials. Proposed amendments to subsection (d) add ''a minimum of'' to modify the 8 hours of continuing education required for each 3-year renewal period. Proposed amendments to subsection (e) increase the fee for a blaster's license renewal from $30 to $150.

§ 210.19. Suspension, modification and revocation

 Cross-references are proposed to be added to Chapters 77, 87 and 88 (relating to noncoal mining; surface mining of coal; and anthracite coal) to clarify that blasting violations at mine sites are also included in the violations to be considered for suspension, modification or revocation actions.

§ 210.20. Fees

 Proposed § 210.20 (relating to fees) imposes an additional fee of $10 per year for administering a blaster's license. This fee is related to the evaluation of continuing education requirements and confirmation that ATF requirements are met.

Chapter 211. Storage, handling and use of explosives

Subchapter A. General provisions

§ 211.101. Definitions

 Proposed amendments to this section add and delete definitions and amend two definitions. The definition of ''ATF'' is proposed to be added. The definition of ''acts'' is proposed to be added to provide a reference to the explosive safety laws of 1937 and 1957. The definition of ''annual administration fee'' is proposed to be added to implement new fees for administering blasting licenses and permits. The definition of ''blast area'' is proposed to be amended to clarify that this area must include the area necessary to be secure to prevent injuries. The definition of ''cube root scaled distance (Ds1/3)'' is proposed to be added to evaluate the potential effects of air blasts from demolition blasting for permit review. The definition of ''display fireworks'' is proposed to be deleted because it is no longer used in Chapter 211; the most recent amendment in 2001 eliminated the need for the definition. The definition of ''employee possessor'' is proposed to be added to implement the cross-reference with ATF requirements. The definition of ''explosive'' is proposed to be deleted and is replaced with the proposed definition of ''explosive materials'' to be consistent with ATF requirements. The definition of ''flyrock'' is proposed to be amended to provide clarity through more detail. The definition of ''nuisance'' is proposed to be added for use regarding enforcement actions by the Department. The definition of ''purchase'' is proposed to be deleted because the requirement for a permit to purchase is being eliminated in the proposed rulemaking. The definition of ''responsible person'' is proposed to be added to implement the cross-reference with ATF requirements. The definition of ''sale or sell'' is proposed to be deleted because the requirement for a permit to sell is proposed to be deleted. The ATF has rules for the sales and purchase of explosives which are more stringent than the Department's existing regulations. The definitions of ''unauthorized detonation of explosives,'' ''unauthorized handling and use of explosives'' and ''unauthorized storage of explosives'' are proposed to be added so it is clear that the Department can take enforcement action when these illegal activities occur.

§ 211.102. Scope

 Proposed amendments to subsection (a) delete the reference to ''purchasing and selling'' since the requirement to have a permit to purchase or a permit to sell is proposed to be deleted. Proposed amendments also clarify which regulations are applicable to underground mining. Subsection (b) is proposed to be amended to delete the reference to ''the purchase or sale of explosives.''

§ 211.103. Enforcement

 Proposed amendments to subsection (a) add that the Department may issue orders for violations and to require corrective actions. Proposed subsection (c) cross-references the mining-specific explosives regulations and includes interference with the Department and falsification of records as violations. Proposed subsection (d) establishes a permit and license block for violations of State and Federal explosives requirements. Persons with an outstanding violation will not be eligible for a permit or license until the outstanding violation is corrected.

Subchapter B. Storage and classification of explosives

§ 211.112. Magazine license and fees

 Proposed subsection (b) requires verification of compliance with ATF requirements prior to approval of a storage magazine license by the Department. Existing subsections (b)—(d) are proposed to be renumbered as subsections (c)—(e). Proposed subsection (d), existing subsection (c), is proposed to be amended to delete the restrictions on the expiration date and period of time that a magazine license may be issued for. This will allow the Department to more efficiently manage the workload of processing magazine license renewals by preventing all of the applications from being due every year by December 31. The Department may allow for storage magazine licenses to be renewed for more than a 1-year period.

§ 211.113. Application contents

 Proposed amendments to subsection (b)(1) add the ATF license or permit number as required information for a magazine license application.

§ 211.115. Standards for classifying and storing explosives and constructing, maintaining and siting magazines

 Proposed subsection (j) requires that a magazine licensee has a person who is available to respond to emergencies and that the Department be granted access to the magazines within 4 hours of requesting access to the magazines to conduct inspections.

§ 211.116. Decommissioning magazines

 Proposed § 211.116 (relating to decommissioning magazines) provides the requirements for when an explosives storage magazine license is no longer valid. When magazines are no longer used, a process to ensure that the explosives are removed from the magazines and either used or moved to another storage location is necessary for public safety. In a recent case, a magazine from a long-closed sporting goods store was scrapped without being emptied. A worker was fatally injured while cutting up the magazine.

§ 211.117. Daily summary of magazine transactions

 Proposed § 211.117 (relating to daily summary of magazine transactions) requires that the explosives inventory records required by the ATF be made available to the Department upon request.

Subchapter C. Permits

§ 211.121. General requirements

 Proposed amendments to subsections (a), (b) and (d) reflect the deletion of the requirement for permits to purchase and permits to sell. In addition, proposed subsection (f) clarifies that three parties are each responsible for compliance with permits—the permittee, the listed subcontractor and the blaster-in-charge.

§ 211.122 Permits to sell explosives

 This section is proposed to be deleted to eliminate the requirement to have a permit to sell explosives in this Commonwealth. The requirement to have a permit to sell explosives predates the requirement for a blasting activity permit and the more stringent ATF requirements put in place in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing. These more recent requirements render the permit to sell explosives obsolete.

§ 211.123. Permits to purchase explosives

 This section is proposed to be deleted to eliminate the requirement to have a permit to purchase explosives in this Commonwealth. The rationale for permits to sell also applies to permits to purchase. The recent requirements render the permit to purchase explosives obsolete.

§ 211.124. Blasting activity permits

 Proposed amendments to subsection (a) require that an application for a blasting activity permit be prepared by a blaster licensed in a category that would be required to conduct the blasting proposed under the application. For example, a blaster licensed in the limited category would not be eligible to prepare a blasting activity permit application to conduct blasting for a trenching and construction project. Proposed subsection (a)(2) and (3) requires a signature by the applicant and documentation of the ATF authorization for the applicant. The paragraphs within subsection (a) are proposed to be renumbered accordingly. Under the existing regulations, only the licensed blaster's signature is required. Requiring the applicant to sign provides documentation that the permit holder has requested the authorization to be granted under the blasting activity permit. The requirement for documentation of the ATF authorization confirms that the applicant or contract blasting company meets the Federal regulatory standards.

 Proposed subsection (a)(4) is proposed to be amended to state more clearly the requirement for a contact person to be listed on an application. Proposed subsection (a)(6), existing subsection (a)(4), is proposed to be amended to add ''specific'' as a modifier for the types of explosives to be used. Different explosives have different characteristics and densities which affect how the explosives perform when detonated and the quantity per volume of the explosives loaded into a borehole. For example, some blasting agent blends have higher detonation velocities than others. Blasting agents with higher detonation velocities produce a stronger shock wave which is ideal for breaking harder rock such as granite. Blasting agent blends with lower detonation velocity produce greater gas pressure and are ideal for breaking sandstone or hard shale. Blast performance is related to the level adverse effects with more efficient blasts resulting in less adverse effects. Including the specific type of explosives in a blasting activity permit application helps the permit reviewer better understand the intent of the applicant so the reviewer can make an informed decision on the feasibility of the activity proposed on the application resulting in regulatory compliance.

 Proposed subsection (a)(9) requires the minimum scaled distance to be included in the application and to specify that for demolition projects the scaled distance to be used is the cube root scaled distance. Scaled distance is an important planning tool to limit the adverse effects of blasting. Cube root scaled distance is used to plan for the effects of air blast which is the most common impact of demolition blasting.

 Proposed subsection (a)(10), existing subsection (a)(7), is proposed to be amended to include that public roads, buildings and other structures must be shown on the map submitted with the application. Proposed subsection (a)(14), existing subsection (a)(11), is proposed to be amended to increase the minimum required liability insurance limits and to require that the permittee be covered by the insurance for what is widely accepted as a minimum industry standard amount. Proposed subsection (a)(17), existing subsection (a)(14), provides standardization for the requirement for identifying the building that will be closest to the blasting. Subsection (a)(20), existing subsection (a)(17), is proposed to be amended to change the minimum distance from 200 feet to 300 feet, or another distance to be specified by the applicant or the Department in the permit, when notification of residents is required. This is necessary due to the potential effects of carbon monoxide produced by blasts.

 Proposed subsection (a)(21) requires specific loading plans describing the ranges of blast design parameter dimensions to more accurately describe how blasts are to be designed and better evaluate the feasibility of the blasting activity to be conducted in compliance with the regulations. Blast design parameter dimensions can be compared to widely accepted norms to evaluate feasibility. Proposed subsection (a)(22) requires a description of the stemming material which is proposed to be used. Drill cuttings or crushed stone are typically used as stemming. While drill cuttings may be effective in some cases, crushed stone is better to ensure that the energy of the detonation of the explosives is contained within the rock. In some cases, such as when blasting is conducted in close proximity to people or structures, the only reasonable type of stemming is crushed stone.

 Proposed subsection (e) requires that the blaster-in-charge have the blasting activity permit or blast plan in his possession. This helps ensure that the blasting will be conducted as planned and approved.

§ 211.125. Blasting activity permit-by-rule

 Subsection (a) is proposed to be amended to exclude demolition and seismic exploration projects from the automatic approval associated with the permit-by-rule. It is necessary to permit blasting for demolition and seismic exploration with individual permits because these uses of explosives are complex and require site-specific planning.

§ 211.126. Fees

 Proposed § 211.126 (relating to fees) imposes fees for the first time for blasting activity permit applications, magazine security plan applications and revisions, magazine decommissioning and monitoring magazines. The fees are based upon the Department's costs for personnel to complete the work. A lower fee is proposed for a blasting activity permit filed online than for a paper application because it is more efficient to process the applications which are filed electronically. Magazine security plan review requires a site visit by the blasting and explosives inspector to confirm that the proposed security measures will be effective in the location where the explosives storage is proposed. Magazine decommissioning requires an inspection to confirm that the magazine has been emptied of the explosives. The monitoring fee is based upon inspecting a magazine at least every other year to determine compliance with the performance standards for explosives storage.

Subchapter D. Records of disposition of explosives

§ 211.131. Sales records

 This section is proposed to be deleted to implement the elimination of the requirement for permits to sell explosives.

§ 211.132. Purchase records

 This section is proposed to be deleted to implement the elimination of the requirement for permits to purchase explosives.

§ 211.133. Blast reports

 Proposed amendments to this section provide clarifications about the information needed to document each blast. The proposed amendments provide specificity about how to comply with the general requirement in subsection (a) ''to provide the Department with sufficient information to reconstruct the conditions and events surrounding a blast.'' Proposed amendments to subsection (a)(1) specify that the blast location must be identified using at least one corner of the blast pattern as a reference point. Proposed subsection (a)(2) requires the distance and direction from the blast to the location where seismograph monitoring was done. Proposed subsection (a)(3) specifies that the latitude and longitude is required for these monitoring locations and that a 911 address be provided for buildings where monitoring is done. The paragraphs within subsection (a) are proposed to be renumbered accordingly.

 Proposed subsection (a)(9), existing subsection (a)(7), is proposed to be amended to add the delay timing and description of the ground around the blast site to required items to be included on the sketch which must accompany the blast record. This information is needed to verify the amount of explosives and the number of holes or decks detonated per delay period and to determine the degree of horizontal relief provided for the blast, which affects levels of adverse effects such as ground vibration and the risk of flyrock.

 Proposed subsection (a)(10), existing subsection (a)(8), is proposed to be amended to specify that the diameter and depth of each blast hole is needed on the blast record. To accurately describe how a blast was loaded, the diameter and depth of each hole must be provided rather than ranges or averages.

 Proposed subsection (a)(12) specifies that the amount of explosives loaded in each hole needs to be reported. Section 211.154(f)(5) (relating to preparing the blast) requires that while loading a blast hole, each blast hole shall be logged throughout the loading process to measure the amount and location of explosives placed in the blast hole and that the information is to be recorded on the blast report required under § 211.133 (relating to blast reports). This requirement is met by specifying that the amount of explosives loaded in each borehole be provided on blast reports.

 Proposed subsection (a)(14), existing subsection (a)(11), is proposed to be amended to add the requirement to include the product density for bulk blasting agents and the weight for packaged blasting agents. This information is needed to verify the scaled distance and the maximum number of pounds per delay for the blast.

 Proposed subsection (a)(17), existing subsection (a)(14), is proposed to be amended to add the requirement to provide the direction in degrees to the nearest building and to include leased buildings in the exception to this requirement. Proposed subsection (a)(18), existing subsection (a)(15), is proposed to be amended to include the street address and latitude and longitude for the nearest building, and delete the reference to local landmarks. Proposed subsection (a)(19), existing subsection (a)(16), is proposed to be amended to describe where the scaled distance is measured to.

 Proposed subsection (a)(26) requires a drill log which shows the condition of all holes which were drilled for a blast whether they were loaded or not. Borehole conditions can vary with some boreholes being in rock that is badly cracked and some in rock that is not cracked. Whether a borehole is cracked throughout its length or not is usually not evident on the surface. It is necessary to provide this information on a blast record because borehole conditions have a significant effect on blast performance.

Subchapter E. Transportation of explosives

§ 211.141. General requirements

 The reference to purchase and sale permittees is proposed to be deleted since the requirement to obtain these permits is proposed to be deleted in this proposed rulemaking. Paragraph (13) is proposed to be amended to specify that it is on-road vehicles that need to pass the State inspection requirements. Proposed paragraph (14) requires that any vehicle used off-road to transport explosives be properly equipped to do so. Proposed paragraph (15) requires that explosives be removed from a vehicle before maintenance or repairs are done on the vehicle.

Subchapter F. Blasting activities

§ 211.151. Prevention of damage or injury

 The heading of this section is proposed to be amended to add ''or injury.''

 Subsection (a) is proposed to be amended to add the concept of prevention of injury. The proposed amendments are focused on safety. The proposed amendments also delete the modifier ''real'' to property to prevent any property damage, not just damage to real property.

 Proposed subsection (b) introduces the concept that blasting needs to be conducted in a manner that prevents a nuisance. Existing subsection (b) is proposed to be renumbered as subsection (c).

 Proposed subsection (d), existing subsection (c), is proposed to be amended to specify the location where the scaled distance applies and to delete the grandfather clause which applied to blasting activities approved prior to July 14, 2001.

 Proposed subsection (e), existing subsection (d), is proposed to be amended to apply the 133 dBL air blast standard under all circumstances. Table 1 is proposed to be deleted to do this. Table 1 was needed in the past because of the variety of instruments used to measure air blast. Technology has provided standardization and the variable limits are no longer applicable.

 Proposed subsection (f) describes the circumstances under which an alternate ground movement limit may be applied by the Department.

 Proposed subsection (g) requires the self-reporting of air blast and ground vibration limit violations within 24 hours of when the violation is identified. High air blast or ground vibration levels are indicative of inefficient blast designs. If inefficient blast designs continue to be employed then other adverse effects such as flyrock or toxic gas migration are more likely to occur. The Department needs to be aware of exceedances of the ground vibration and air blast limits so that it can evaluate the situation to determine if action is necessary to ensure public safety.

 Proposed subsection (h) requires that blasting be conducted in a manner that protects utility lines. Sections 211.181 and 211.182 (relating to scope; and general provisions) provide for the protection of underground utilities. Proposed subsection (h) clarifies that all utilities, including overhead utilities, must be protected.

§ 211.152. Control of noxious gases, including carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen

 The heading of this section is proposed to be amended to add carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen. Subsection (a) is proposed to be amended to add ''toxic'' to modify gases, specify carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen, and describe the measures which can be taken to reduce the risk of and adverse impact from the gases. Carbon monoxide has become a more prominent issue in recent years due to the proximity of blasting to homes and the availability of carbon monoxide detectors. Workers and residents of nearby homes are subject to this risk because blasting produces large volumes of gases.

 Proposed subsection (b) requires reporting to the Department of incidents when gases have affected the health or safety of workers or neighbors. In cases when gases have affected the health or safety of workers or neighbors, the Department needs to evaluate the situation to determine what safeguards should be put in place to ensure public safety prior to further blasting operations on the site.

§ 211.154. Preparing the blast

 Subsection (a) is proposed to be amended to specify that both the blaster-in-charge and the permittee are responsible for the effects of a blast. Proposed amendments to subsection (b) add a description of the documentation needed in a request for a lower distance limitation for equipment operation not related to the blast loading. Subsection (d) is proposed to be amended to specify that at-the-hole communication or written drill logs are required for the blaster-in-charge to know the condition of the holes which are to be loaded. It is necessary that this information is provided to blasters because borehole conditions should be used to determine if, or how, each borehole is loaded. These conditions have a significant effect on blast performance. This is necessary to determine how to load boreholes in a manner that results in a safe and efficient blast. Subsection (f)(5) is proposed to be amended to replace the erroneous term ''leading'' to be the correct term ''loading.'' Subsection (n) is proposed to be amended to provide very specific options for protecting the traveling public. These measures are consistent with the requirements in Chapter 87.

§ 211.155. Preblast measures

 Paragraph (7) is proposed to be added to require the posting of signs at the blast site to provide warning that blasting operations are underway.

§ 211.158. Mudcapping

 Proposed amendments to this section reduce the amount of explosives that may be used since the mudcapping technique results in open-air detonation which can produce extremely high air blasts and presents a higher risk for flyrock.

Subchapter G. Requirements for monitoring

§ 211.171. General provisions for monitoring

 Existing subsection (b) is proposed to be deleted as it is no longer necessary to allow for this exception for monitoring since technology improvements have made seismographs more readily available compared to 1972 when this exception was established. The remainder of the subsections are proposed to be renumbered accordingly. Proposed subsection (e) requires that seismographs meet industry standards as established by the International Society of Explosives Engineers, an international organization comprised of blasters and other explosives industry personnel such as blasting vibration and safety consultants and seismograph manufacturers.

§ 211.172. Monitoring instruments

 Existing paragraphs (1) and (2) are proposed to be deleted because blasting seismographs have been standardized to eliminate the need for these distinctions. Proposed subsection (b) establishes equipment specifications based upon industry standards as established by the International Society of Explosives Engineers. This section is proposed to be renumbered accordingly.

Subchapter H. Blasting activities near underground utility lines

 ''Underground'' is proposed to be added in the heading of this subchapter to be consistent with the scope described in § 211.181.

§ 211.182. General provisions

 Proposed subsection (a) requires notification to the owner of an underground utility line when blasting is planned within 200 feet of the line. Notifying a pipeline owner when blasting is proposed within 200 feet of a pipeline is a statutory requirement and is also required under Chapters 77, 87 and 88. The requirement to notify the owners of all underground utility lines is necessary to insure that measures necessary to protect the utility line are implemented. In many cases, PA One Call can be used to make the notification to the underground utility line owner. Existing subsections (b) and (c) are proposed to be deleted as no longer necessary due to advances in explosives product technology and research focused on the effects of ground vibration on utility lines. This subsection is proposed to be renumbered accordingly.

Subchapter I. Seismic exploration

 Proposed Subchapter I (relating to seismic exploration) is intended to address the requirements that are unique to the use of explosives for seismic exploration.

§ 211.191. Scope

 This section establishes the applicability of Subchapter I to the use of explosives for seismic exploration. This use of explosives requires that explosives remain in the ground for extended periods of time due to the large number of holes to be loaded.

§ 211.192. Permits

 This section describes the additional information that is needed in a permit application for the use of explosives for seismic exploration. Paragraph (1) requires a plan for control and security of loaded holes. In seismic exploration operations, unlike other blasting operations, the explosives charges remain in the ground for a significant time after loading. Paragraph (2) requires reporting of the length of time that the explosives are expected to be in the ground before they are detonated. Two factors must be weighed in the evaluation of an application for seismic blasting. These are the product durability and longevity after loading and how long the explosives remain in the ground. Paragraph (3) requires a map showing where the explosives will be loaded and any mine permit areas within 500 feet of this area. For a permit reviewer to make an informed decision as to the degree of risk to public safety or property, it is necessary to know where the explosives are proposed to be loaded relative to public activity, infrastructure, homes, other buildings, mining activity or any other area of concern. Paragraph (4) requires the specifications for the explosives to be used. This is necessary to minimize the risk for misfires due to product failure.

§ 211.193. Blasting records

 This section describes the additional information that is needed on blast records for the use of explosives for seismic exploration. Paragraph (1) requires the time and date when each hole was loaded. This in needed because the blast holes are loaded over the course of a number of days. Paragraph (2) requires identification of the blaster-in-charge who supervised loading or loaded each hole. Paragraph (3) requires the latitude and longitude of each hole. Paragraph (4) requires identification of the blaster-in-charge who detonated the explosives in each hole. Paragraph (5) requires the time and date when the charges were detonated. This reflects the fact that the holes may be detonated over the course of a number of days.

§ 211.194. General requirements for handling explosives on a seismic exploration operation

 This section describes the requirements for the handling and use of explosives for seismic exploration. Subsection (a) excludes § 211.153(e) and (f) (relating to general requirements for handling explosives) because in seismic exploration it is necessary to load explosives over the course of a number of days so the explosives remain in the ground for days or weeks. In the alternative, subsection (b)(1) and (3) provides requirements to prevent misfires and provide blast site security. Subsection (b)(2) prohibits the placement of explosives in the ground within 300 feet of a building or other structure, but allows for exceptions to be authorized.

 Subsection (b)(4) excludes mining permit areas from the area where explosives may be placed and provides a process for an exception from this exclusion. The exemption process includes requirements for the demonstration of the legal right to enter the property, a safety plan, a map and documentation of any required mine safety training.

 Subsection (b)(5) addresses the security of all loaded blast holes. Subsection (b)(6) requires the removal or destruction in place for any explosives which may have been compromised. Subsection (b)(7) sets an upper limit of 1 year as the amount of time that explosives may remain undetonated in the ground. This time frame was established based upon the characteristics of the explosives typically used for seismic exploration.

Subchapter J. Civil penalties

 Proposed Subchapter J (relating to civil penalties) is intended to provide a system for assessing civil penalties for violations of Chapter 211 that occur at operations when explosives are used for construction, demolition, seismic exploration and other nonmining uses. This provides an alternative to filing summary citations with local magistrates. The system and procedure is modeled after the system and procedure applicable to mining under Chapter 77 and Chapter 86 (relating to surface and underground coal mining: general). It will make penalties for violations relating to blasting activities conducted in nonmining applications consistent with mining operations.

§ 211.201. Scope

 This section establishes the scope to be blasting activity sites and for unauthorized activities involving explosives. This section clarifies that for mining violations, if the procedures under the mining regulations are followed, this subchapter is not applicable.

§ 211.202. Inspection—general

 This section describes the notification process in cases when an inspection results in the identification of a violation.

§ 211.203. Assessment of civil penalty

 This section describes the circumstances under which the Department will assess a civil penalty.

§ 211.204. System for assessment of penalties

 This section establishes the system for calculating civil penalty amounts.

 Subsection (b) includes seriousness, culpability, speed of compliance, cost to the Commonwealth, savings to the violator and history of violations as the factors to be considered in calculating a civil penalty amount.

 Subsection (b)(1) provides examples of the elements to be considered in determining the seriousness of a violation. These include injury or death, damage, costs of restoration, interference with person's right to enjoyment of life or property, and unauthorized activities. Subsection (b)(2) addresses the culpability factor. The culpability includes evaluation of negligence, willfulness, recklessness and intentional violations. Subsection (b)(3) provides for a credit of up to $1,000 for rapid compliance with the requirements of an order. Subsection (b)(4) provides for recovery for costs to the Department resulting from a violation. Subsection (b)(5) provides for a calculation to address the cost saving to the violator for avoided costs as a result of a violation. Subsection (b)(6) addresses the history of violations providing for an increase of the penalty based upon other violations for the violator in the 1-year period preceding the violation.

 Subsection (c) provides for a minimum penalty amount of $750 if the violation results in the cessation of operations and for a minimum $750 per day for each day when a violator fails to comply with a previously issued order.

 Subsection (d) provides that each day of violation may be considered as a separate violation. Subsection (e) provides for an upper limit on the penalty amount and that if the violations are attributable to more than one person each person is subject to the maximum penalty amount.

§ 211.205. Procedures for assessment of civil penalties

 Subsection (a) provides for an opportunity for a person cited with a violation to provide information to the Department for consideration in determining the penalty amount and for the Department to revise the penalty calculation. Subsection (b) requires the Department to serve a copy of a civil penalty assessment by registered or certified mail or by personal service. Subsection (c) allows for an informal conference to discuss an assessment, either upon request of the person to whom the assessment is issued or by the Department's own volition. Subsection (d) establishes the requirements for an informal civil penalty conference.

§ 211.206. Final action

 Subsection (a) provides that an assessment of civil penalty is appealable to the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB). Subsection (b) describes how the Department is to handle the money posted as escrow during the pendency of an appeal of a civil penalty. Subsection (c) requires the posting of an appeal bond or cash to perfect an appeal of a civil penalty. Subsection (d) provides that both the fact of the violation and the amount of the civil penalty may be challenged when an appeal is filed.

§ 211.207. Final assessment and payment of penalty

 Subsection (a) provides that an assessment of civil penalty becomes final and the payment is due upon the lapse of the appeal period. Subsection (b) provides that a request for judicial review of an EHB civil penalty appeal decision results in the retention of the escrow status and that otherwise the escrow fund will be transferred. Subsection (c) provides that if the penalty is reduced as a result of the appeal process, the Department will refund the appropriate escrowed amount with interest within 30 days of the EHB or court order. Subsection (d) provides that if the result of the appeal process is an increase in the civil penalty amount, then the responsible party must pay the difference within 30 days of the EHB or court order.

F. Benefits, Costs and Compliance

 This proposed rulemaking updates the existing regulatory framework regarding blasting and explosives. The proposed amendments will increase the cost of compliance, but provide more certainty to the regulated community with regard to operational requirements. The fact that these requirements will also improve public safety and documentation of blasting activities suggests that the benefits greatly outweigh the costs.

Benefits

 The proposed rulemaking deletes the obsolete requirements for permits related to the purchase and sale of explosives. It also improves public safety and provides for more complete documentation of blasting activities. Adding a specific subchapter for seismic exploration provides relief from requirements that cannot be met by that segment of the regulated community and provides alternatives that protect the public safety.

Compliance costs

 The proposed rulemaking is expected to result in increased costs, specifically due to new or increased fees. However, the new or increased fees are nominal in comparison with the other costs associated with the use of explosives. The fees are intended to recover a portion of the Department's costs associated with the administration of the explosives safety laws of the Commonwealth. Proposed Subchapter J, regarding civil penalties, will also increase costs for those in the regulated community who do not comply with the requirements. It is anticipated that the increased costs from the assessment of civil penalties will be partially offset by the reduction or elimination of the need to pursue enforcement through summary citations.

Compliance Assistance Plan

 Compliance with the proposed rulemaking is expected to be seamless since many of the more stringent requirements are in place through permitting or are incremental changes to the existing requirements. Compliance assistance for this proposed rulemaking will be provided through routine interaction with trade groups and individual applicants.

Paperwork requirements

 This proposed rulemaking requires additional information as part of a permit application and for records of blasting activities. The additional requirements are more focused and clarify the requirements.

G. Pollution Prevention

 The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.A. §§ 13101—13109) established a National policy that promotes pollution prevention as the preferred means for achieving state environmental protection goals. The Department encourages pollution prevention, which is the reduction or elimination of pollution at its source, through the substitution of environmentally friendly materials, more efficient use of raw materials and the incorporation of energy efficiency strategies. Pollution prevention practices can provide greater environmental protection with greater efficiency because they can result in significant cost savings to facilities that permanently achieve or move beyond compliance. This proposed rulemaking has minimal impact on pollution prevention since it is focused on public safety.

H. Sunset Review

 These regulations will be reviewed in accordance with the sunset review schedule published by the Department to determine whether the regulations effectively fulfill the goals for which they were intended.

I. Regulatory Review

 Under section 5(a) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5(a)), on February 17, 2016, the Department submitted a copy of this proposed rulemaking and a copy of a Regulatory Analysis Form to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) and to the Chairpersons of the Senate and House Environmental Resources and Energy Committees. A copy of this material is available to the public upon request.

 Under section 5(g) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC may convey any comments, recommendations or objections to the proposed rulemaking within 30 days of the close of the public comment period. The comments, recommendations or objections must specify the regulatory review criteria in section 5.2 of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5b) which have not been met. The Regulatory Review Act specifies detailed procedures for review, prior to final publication of the rulemaking, by the Department, the General Assembly and the Governor of comments, recommendations or objections raised.

J. Public Comments

 Interested persons are invited to submit written comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed rulemaking to the Board. Comments, suggestions or objections must be received by the Board by March 28, 2016. In addition to the submission of comments, interested persons may also submit a summary of their comments to the Board. The summary may not exceed one page in length and must also be received by the Board by March 28, 2016. The one-page summary will be distributed to the Board and available publicly prior to the meeting when the final rulemaking will be considered.

 Comments including the submission of a one-page summary of comments may be submitted to the Board online, by e-mail, by mail or express mail as follows. If an acknowledgement of comments submitted online or by e-mail is not received by the sender within 2 working days, the comments should be retransmitted to the Board to ensure receipt. Comments submitted by facsimile will not be accepted.

 Comments may be submitted to the Board by accessing eComment at www.ahs.dep.pa.gov/eComment. Comments may be submitted to the Board by e-mail at RegComments@pa.gov. A subject heading of the proposed rulemaking and a return name and address must be included in each transmission.

 Written comments should be mailed to the Environmental Quality Board, P. O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477. Express mail should be sent to the Environmental Quality Board, Rachel Carson State Office Building, 16th Floor, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301.

JOHN QUIGLEY, 
Chairperson

Fiscal Note: 7-522. No fiscal impact; (8) recommends adoption.

Annex A

TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Subpart D. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

ARTICLE IV. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

CHAPTER 210. BLASTERS' LICENSES

§ 210.11. Definitions.

 The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

ATF—The United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Blaster—A person who is licensed by the Department under this chapter to detonate explosives and supervise blasting activities.

Blaster learner—An individual who is learning to be a blaster and who participates in blasting activities under the direct supervision of a blaster.

Blaster's license—A license to detonate explosives and supervise blasting activities issued by the Department under this chapter.

Demolition and demolition blasting—The act of wrecking or demolishing a structure with explosives.

Employee possessor—An individual who is in possession of or has control of explosives materials.

Explosive materials—Any material classified as an explosive by the ATF in its most current list published in the Federal Register under 18 U.S.C.A. § 841(d) and 27 CFR 555.23 (relating to list of explosive materials).

Limited—A classification of blaster's license applicable to persons who supervise the loading or detonate explosives in operations in which the use of explosives is not related to excavation or demolition.

Mine opening blasting—Blasting conducted for the purpose of constructing a shaft, slope, drift or tunnel mine opening for an underground mine, either operating or under development from the surface down to the point where the mine opening connects with the mineral strata to be or being extracted.

Person—A natural person.

Responsible person—

(i) An individual who has the authority to direct the management and policies of the ATF licensee or permittee pertaining to explosive materials.

(ii) Generally, the term includes partners, sole proprietors, site managers, corporate officers and directors, and majority shareholders.

§ 210.13. General.

 (a) A person may not detonate explosives or supervise blasting activities unless the person has obtained a blaster's license.

(b) A blaster's license will only be issued or renewed after it is verified that the applicant has complied with 18 U.S.C.A. Chapter 40 and 27 CFR Part 555 (relating to commerce in explosives), and has undergone a background check as either a responsible person or an employee possessor by the ATF. Verification can be provided by the applicant entering the ATF license or permit number under which the requirement for a background check was met.

[(b)] (c) The Department may exempt certain individuals from needing a blaster's license if the person is detonating extremely small amounts of explosives for industrial or research purposes. The Department will consider a written request for an exemption from the person seeking the exemption.

[(c)] (d) Upon request, a blaster shall exhibit a blaster's license to the following:

 (1) An authorized representative of the Department.

 (2) The blaster's employer or an authorized representative of the employer.

 (3) A police officer acting in the line of duty.

[(d)] (e) A blaster's license is not transferable.

§ 210.15. License application.

 (a) The license application shall be on forms provided by the Department and be accompanied by a check for [$50] $150 payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The complete application shall be submitted to the Department at least 2 weeks prior to the examination.

*  *  *  *  *

§ 210.16. Examinations.

*  *  *  *  *

 (c) An applicant failing to appear for a scheduled examination forfeits the application fee unless the applicant provides written notice to the Department 2 weeks prior to the examination date or submits a valid medical excuse in writing.

*  *  *  *  *

§ 210.17. Issuance and renewal of licenses.

 (a) A blaster's license is issued for a specific classification of blasting activities. The classifications will be determined by the Department and may include general blasting (which includes all classifications except demolition, mine opening blasting and underground noncoal mining), trenching and construction, [seismic and pole line work, well perforation] law enforcement, surface mining, underground noncoal mining, mine opening blasting, industrial, limited and demolition.

*  *  *  *  *

 (d) A blaster's license is renewable if the blaster can demonstrate that he has had a minimum of 8 hours of continuing education in Department-approved courses related to blasting and safety within the [3 year] 3-year period.

 (e) The blaster's license may be renewed for a 3-year term by submitting a renewal application to the Department and a check for [$30] $150, payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

*  *  *  *  *

§ 210.19. Suspension, modification and revocation.

 The Department may issue orders suspending, modifying or revoking a blaster's license. Before an order is issued, the Department will give the blaster an opportunity for an informal meeting to discuss the facts and issues that form the basis of the Department's determination to suspend, modify or revoke the license. The Department may suspend, modify or revoke a blaster's license for violations of this chapter and [Chapter 211 (relating to storage, handling and use of explosives in surface applications)] Chapters 77, 87, 88 and 211.

 (Editor's Note: The following section is new and printed in regular type to enhance readability.)

§ 210.20. Fees.

 The Department will assess an annual administration fee for the administration of blaster's licenses. The annual administration fee for a blaster's license is $10.

CHAPTER 211. STORAGE, HANDLING AND USE OF EXPLOSIVES

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

§ 211.101. Definitions.

 The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

ATF—The United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Access point—A point in the outer perimeter security and a point in the inner perimeter security that allows entry to or exit from the magazine or the magazine site.

Acts—Sections 7 and 11 of the act of July 1, 1937 (P. L. 2681, No. 537) (73 P. S. §§ 157 and 161), section 3 of the act of July 10, 1957 (P. L. 685, No. 362) (73 P. S. § 166) and Reorganization Plan No. 8 of 1981 (71 P. S. § 751-35).

Airblast—An airborne shock wave resulting from an explosion, also known as air overpressure, which may or may not be audible.

Annual administration fee—A nonrefundable fee assessed annually based on the cost to the Department of inspecting and administering a permitted activity or a licensed facility and to administer a permit or license.

Blast area—The area around the blast site that [should] must be cleared and secured to prevent the potential for injury to persons and damage to property.

Blast site—The specific location where the explosives charges are loaded into the blast holes.

*  *  *  *  *

Concertina razor wire—Razor wire that is extended in a spiral for use as a barrier, such as along or on a fence and having a minimum of 101 coils of wire to 50 linear feet.

Cube root scaled distance (Ds1/3)—A value calculated by using the formula Ds1/3 = D/(cube root) W, where actual distance (D) in feet measured in a horizontal line from the blast site to the nearest building or structure not owned or leased by the blasting activity applicant, the permittee or their customers, is divided by the cube root of the maximum weight of explosives (W) in pounds detonated per delay period of less than 8 milliseconds.

Delay interval—The designed time interval, usually in milliseconds, between successive detonations.

Detonator—

 (i) A device containing an initiating or primary explosive that is used for initiating detonation of explosives.

 (ii) The term includes electric blasting caps of instantaneous and delay types, blasting caps for use with safety fuses, detonating cord, delay connectors, and nonelectric instantaneous and delay blasting caps.

[Display fireworks—

(i) Large fireworks designed primarily to produce visible or audible effects by combustion, deflagration or detonation.

(ii) The term includes, but is not limited to, salutes containing more than 2 grains (130 mg) of explosive materials, aerial shells containing more than 40 grams of pyrotechnic compositions, and other display pieces which exceed the limits of explosive materials for classification as consumer fireworks. Display fireworks are classified as fireworks UN0333, UN0334 or UN0335 by the United States Department of Transportation at 49 CFR 172.101 (relating to purpose and use of hazardous materials table).

(iii) The term also includes fused setpieces containing components which together exceed 50 mg of salute powder.

Explosive—A chemical compound, mixture or device that contains oxidizing and combustible materials or other ingredients in such proportions or quantities that an ignition by fire, friction, concussion, percussion or detonation may result in an explosion.

(i) The term includes safety fuse, squibs, detonating cord and igniters.

(ii) The term does not include the following:

(A) Commercially manufactured black powder, percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, matches and friction primers, intended to be used solely for sporting, recreational or cultural purposes in antique firearms or antique devices, as defined in 18 U.S.C.A. § 921 (relating to definitions).

(B) Smokeless powder, primers used for reloading rifle or pistol cartridges, shot shells, percussion caps and smokeless propellants intended for personal use.]

Employee possessor—An individual who is in possession of or has control of explosives materials.

Explosive materials—The term as defined in § 210.11 (relating to definitions).

Flyrock—Overburden, stone, clay or other material [ejected] cast from the blast [area] site through the air or along the ground, by the force of a blast[.], and which travels to one of the following areas:

(i) Beyond the blast area.

(ii) Onto property neither owned nor leased by the permittee or its customer.

(iii) Beyond permit boundaries on blasting operations on mining permits issued under the Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act (52 P. S. §§ 1396.1—1396.19b), or the Noncoal Surface Mining and Conservation and Reclamation Act (52 P. S. §§ 3301—3326).

Indoor magazine—A magazine located entirely within a secure intrusion-resistant and theft-resistant building which is primarily used for commercial or industrial purposes.

*  *  *  *  *

Misfire—Incomplete detonation of explosives.

Nuisance—A condition which causes a hazard to public health or safety.

Outdoor magazine site—The contiguous area of land upon which the following are located: a magazine or group of magazines; the outer perimeter security, and the inner perimeter security, if any.

*  *  *  *  *

Person—A natural person, partnership, association[,] or corporation, or an agency, instrumentality or entity of state government or a municipality.

Primer—A cartridge or package of high explosives into which a detonator has been inserted or attached.

[Purchase—To obtain ownership of explosives from another person.

Sale or sell—To transfer ownership of explosives to another person.]

Responsible person

(i) An individual who has the authority to direct the management and policies of the ATF licensee or permittee pertaining to explosive materials.

(ii) Generally, the term includes partners, sole proprietors, site managers, corporate officers and directors, and majority shareholders.

Scaled distance (Ds)—A value calculated by using the formula Ds = D/(square root) W, where actual distance (D) in feet, measured in a horizontal line from the blast site to the nearest building or structure, neither owned nor leased by the blasting activity permittee or its customer, divided by the square root of the maximum weight of explosives (W) in pounds, that is detonated per delay period of less than 8 milliseconds.

[Ds = D/(square root) W]

Stemming—Inert material placed in a blast hole after an explosive charge for the purpose of confining the explosion gases to the blast hole, and inert material used to separate explosive charges in decked holes.

Structure

 (i) A combination of materials or pieces of work built or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner for occupancy, use or ornamentation.

 (ii) The term includes everything that is built or constructed, including bridges, offices, water towers, silos and dwellings.

Unauthorized detonation of explosives—The detonation of explosives by a person who is not licensed to detonate explosives under Chapter 210 or the detonation of explosives not authorized by a permit issued under this chapter.

Unauthorized handling and use of explosives—The transportation, handling or use of explosives by a person who is not a responsible person or an employee possessor acting under the authorization of a responsible person.

Unauthorized storage of explosives—Storage of explosives that is not in a magazine licensed by the Department or by persons who are not responsible persons or employee possessors acting under the authorization of a responsible person.

Utility line—An electric cable, fiber optic line, pipeline or other type of conduit used to transport or transmit electricity, gases, liquids and other media including information.

Wheeled vehicle—A vehicle that moves about on three or more wheels and has a gross vehicle weight of less than 11,000 pounds.

§ 211.102. Scope.

 (a) This chapter applies to persons using[, storing, purchasing and selling] or storing explosives and engaging in blasting activities within this Commonwealth. Persons [using and] storing explosives underground at permitted underground mines are exempt from this chapter. Persons conducting blasting underground at underground mines shall comply with § 211.151 (relating to prevention of damage or injury). The storage of explosives in magazines on the surface at an underground [noncoal] mine is subject to the applicable requirements of this chapter. The provisions of this chapter that are more stringent than the blasting provisions in Chapters 77, 87 and 88 (relating to noncoal mining; surface mining of coal; and anthracite coal) apply to blasting activities at coal or noncoal surface mines.

 (b) Compliance with this chapter does not relieve a person who is engaged in [the purchase or sale of explosives, or] blasting activities[,] from compliance with other applicable laws or regulations of the Commonwealth.

§ 211.103. Enforcement.

 (a) The Department may issue orders necessary to implement this chapter including an order to suspend, modify or revoke a license or permit authorized by this chapter, or to require corrective action for a violation identified in subsection (c).

 (b) Before issuing an order modifying peak particle velocity or airblast limits in a blasting activity permit, the Department will first provide the permittee with an opportunity to meet and discuss modifications.

(c) It is a violation of this chapter to:

(1) Fail to comply with this chapter or Chapter 77, 87 or 88 (relating to noncoal mining; surface mining of coal; and anthracite coal), regarding storage and use of explosives.

(2) Fail to comply with any order or permit or license of the Department issued under this chapter or Chapter 77, 87 or 88.

(3) Hinder, obstruct or interfere with the Department or its personnel in the performance of any duty hereunder.

(4) Violate 18 Pa.C.S. § 4903 or § 4904 (relating to false swearing; and unsworn falsification to authorities).

(d) The Department will not issue a permit or license to any person who has done any of the following:

(1) Failed or continues to fail to comply with this chapter, a condition of a permit issued under this chapter or an order issued to enforce the requirements of this chapter.

(2) Demonstrated an inability or lack of intention to comply with this chapter as indicated by a past or continuing violation.

(3) Not complied with the 18 U.S.C.A. Chapter 40 and 27 CFR Part 555 (relating to commerce in explosives) and does not have an ATF license or permit, when required.

(4) Not met the requirements to be authorized as an employee possessor or responsible person by the ATF.

[Continued on next Web Page]



No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit.

This material has been drawn directly from the official Pennsylvania Bulletin full text database. Due to the limitations of HTML or differences in display capabilities of different browsers, this version may differ slightly from the official printed version.